SEP Plan Pitfalls
Note - Any federal tax advice contained in this transcript is intended to apply to the specific situation described and should not be considered official guidance independent of the presentation. The tax advice and statements contained herein should not be relied upon for retirement planning purposes without first consulting a tax or retirement planning professional. This transcript has been edited for technical accuracy and may differ slightly from the audio recording of the SEP Plan Pitfalls phone forum. This information is current as of February 26, 2010. Since changes may have occurred, no guarantees are made concerning the technical accuracy after that date.
Moderator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to the SEP Plan Pitfalls phone forum. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we’ll conduct a question and answer session, and instructions will be given at that time. As a reminder, today’s call is being recorded. At this time, I’d like to turn the call over to Avaneesh Bhagat. Please go ahead.
A. Bhagat: Hello, everyone. I’m Avaneesh Bhagat, Program Coordinator for the Employee Plan’s Voluntary Compliance Program. Welcome to the SEP Plan Pitfalls phone forum. I want to thank you for your participation today, and I also want to thank those who sent questions via e-mail. We’ll try to cover as many questions as we can, and if time permits, we may be able to entertain some live questions.
Today’s session will consist of two parts. The first, and major part of this event, will consist of a presentation on potential problems faced by employers who maintain SEP plans. This presentation will be made by Mikio Thomas, the Customer Education and Outreach Analyst for the Director of Employee Plans. Mr. Thomas has, among other things, made many presentations before employer groups and associations of tax professionals with the goal of assisting employers in their effort to provide tax-favored retirement benefits to their employees. I know that you will find this presentation to be informative.
The second part will consist of a question and answer session. I will contribute to this portion of the presentation. The goal here will be to cover the questions sent by e-mail, and if time permits, live questions.
As mentioned earlier, my name is Avaneesh Bhagat, and I work with the Voluntary Compliance Program. I work with [plans that] have fallen out of compliance but want to correct errors and preserve the tax-favored status of their retirement plan. However, my sincere hope is that Mr. Thomas’ presentation will assist plans in the effort to prevent problems from occurring in the first place.
A couple of final administrative items before we begin. Continuing education credits -- we will e-mail a certificate of completion to everyone who registers for this session and who attends the full session. Enrolled agents are entitled to continuing professional education credit for this session. For tax professionals other than enrolled agents, consult with your licensing organization to see if it will provide continuing professional education credits for the session.
Finally, please be advised that the following program, including questions and answers, will be recorded and maintained in accordance with federal recordkeeping laws. This recording is a work of the U.S. Government and is in the public domain. A transcript and/or audio recording of this program may be made publicly available on www.irs.gov.
Without further ado, here is Mikio Thomas.
M. Thomas: Thank you, Avaneesh. The listen-only mode by the operator -- I wish I could get some of that so I could use it on my teenage kids. I was looking for a joke or a quote for a Friday afternoon session, and I found the noted theologian, John Gresham Machen said, “Afternoon classes – that evil invention.” And I’m sure he said that on a Friday, but we’re going to make it a good one for you.
Many of you have clients who are setting money aside in a SEP Retirement Plan. For the next 60 minutes we will be talking about the pitfalls that employers sometimes encounter when sponsoring a SEP. At the end of today’s session we hope you’ll be able to locate the IRS SEP Fix-It Guide on our Web site, www.irs.gov/ep, and use the guide to help your clients find, fix and avoid common SEP plan mistakes. Let Avaneesh and I help you help your clients keep their retirement plans running smoothly, and stay a step ahead of the IRS.
For those of you that have the handout available, the second slide has my name and e-mail address, as well as Avaneesh’s name and e-mail address. As Avaneesh mentioned, I work for Customer Education and Outreach. We provide the publications and the Web sites, etc., hopefully to make your job easier. If you have any thoughts, suggestions to make any of the publications better or the Web site better, please send me an e-mail and give us your suggestions.
The third slide shows a snapshot of the SEP Fix-It Guide. This guide discusses the steps to find, fix and avoid the five most common mistakes that the IRS sees in SEP retirement plans. This is with the examination agents and what the voluntary compliance program receives -- the top five errors. You can view this guide from the Employee Plans landing page by entering www.irs.gov/ep in your Web browser. On the main page, the link is called Fix-It Guides - Common Problems, Real Solutions.
Each of the potential mistakes found in this Fix-It Guide includes tips on how to find the mistake, what corrective action and IRS correction programs you can use to fix the mistake and common-sense tips on how to avoid making the mistake in the future. If you click on the hyperlinked “More” in the table, you will be directed to additional information, including examples on each of the potential mistakes.
Before we dive into the details of each mistake, let’s take a few minutes to discuss an overview of SEP plans. SEP is an acronym meaning Simplified Employee Pension plan. Any size business, even self-employed individuals, can establish a SEP. There are three basic steps in setting up a SEP. First, the employer must execute a formal, written agreement. Second, the employer must give each eligible employee certain information about the SEP. And last, a SEP-IRA must be set up by or for each eligible employee.
Let’s take a few minutes and get into more detail about each one. First, the written agreement requirement. This can be satisfied by adopting an IRS model SEP using Form 5305-SEP. You can simply download and print this form from the IRS Web site. Your client does not need to file this form with the IRS. Using Form 5305-SEP will usually relieve the employer from filing annual retirement plan information returns with the IRS and the Department of Labor.
Now, there are some exceptions to using the Form 5305-SEP. An employer cannot use this form if any of the following apply:
Another type of written SEP document is a prototype SEP. Financial institutions and other approved organizations can sponsor the prototype, and the IRS issues opinion letters approving them. Prototype plans are then sold to individual businesses, who adopt them.
One other method for setting up a SEP, that is not as common, is for plan sponsors to adopt an individually designed document and the IRS has not established any approval process for these types of plans.
Second, the employer must give each eligible employee certain information about the SEP. So now, once you have the SEP document in its place, the employer must give each eligible employee a copy of the Form 5305-SEP, its instructions and the other information listed in the form instructions.
An IRS model SEP is not considered adopted until the employer gives each eligible employee this information. If the employer adopts a prototype SEP, it must give each eligible employee similar information that can be found in the model Form 5305-SEP.
Lastly, a SEP-IRA must be set up by or for each employee who was eligible to be in the plan. SEP-IRAs can be set up with banks, insurance companies or other qualified financial institutions and the employer sends its SEP contributions to where the SEP-IRAs are maintained. The employer can set up a SEP for a year as late as the due date, including extensions, of the business’s income tax return for that year.
Under a SEP, the employer makes contributions to traditional IRAs set up for eligible employees, including self-employed individuals, subject to certain limits. A SEP is funded solely by employer contributions, so no employee contributions would be permitted. Each employee is always 100% vested in, or has ownership of, all money in his or her SEP-IRA.
Generally, any employee who performs services for the business must be included in the SEP. However, there are some exceptions to this general rule. The employer may exclude those employees who have not worked for the employer during three out of the last five years; have not reached age 21; are employees who are covered by union agreement and whose retirement benefits were bargained for in good faith by the employer and the employee’s union; who are non-resident alien employees who have no U.S. wages from the employer; and finally, employees who received less than $550 in compensation, subject to cost-of-living adjustments during the year. Generally, W-2 compensation satisfies the definition of compensation.
The SEP plan requires a SEP-IRA to hold the contributions made for each of the eligible employees. The SEP plan document will indicate the amount the employer has agreed to contribute. This amount can be discretionary, including zero. The SEP document must include a definite, written allocation formula for determining how the employer will allocate its contributions to employee SEP-IRAs. SEP contributions must bear a uniform relationship to compensation, meaning each employee’s contribution must represent the same percentage of compensation. The amount of compensation taken into account under the plan is limited to $245,000 in 2010, and this, too, is subject to cost-of-living adjustments in later years.
Another limit is on the total contributions to each employee’s SEP-IRA. They cannot exceed the lesser of $49,000 for the year 2010, or 25% of compensation. And, again, the $49,000 is subject to the cost-of-living adjustment in later years.
The employer sends the SEP contributions to the financial institution that will manage the funds. Depending on the financial institution, SEP contributions can be invested in individual stocks, mutual funds and other similar types of investments. Each SEP participant must receive an annual statement showing the amount contributed for the year.
Before we move on, I want to talk a little bit about taking money out of a SEP-IRA. We receive a lot of questions on this. Because the SEP investment vehicle is an IRA, the IRA rules apply. Therefore, employees can withdraw SEP contributions and earnings at any time. Money withdrawn is taxable in the year it is received. If an employee makes a withdrawal before he or she is age 59-1/2, generally a 10% additional tax applies.
Employees may roll over SEP contributions and earnings tax-free to other IRAs and retirement plans. SEP contributions and earnings must eventually be distributed. The law requires specific minimum amounts to be distributed by April 1st of the year following the year the employee turns age 70-1/2, and by December 31st of all later years.
An employer generally has no filing requirements of the Form 5500 series return for a SEP. The financial institution that holds the plan’s SEP-IRAs handles most of any other paperwork.
If an employer makes mistakes with respect to a SEP plan, he can use the IRS’s Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System, or as it’s affectionately known, EPCRS, to remedy the mistakes and avoid the consequences of plan disqualification. A correction for the mistakes should be reasonable and appropriate. The correction method should resemble one already provided for in the code, and the employer should consider all applicable facts and circumstances. The Revenue Procedure is 2008-50. Again, Revenue Procedure 2008-50 sets forth the EPCRS, which has three components.
The first component is the Self-Correction Program, or the acronym SCP. It permits a plan sponsor to correct certain plan failures without contacting the IRS and without paying any fee. In order to be eligible for this program, the plan sponsor or administrator must have established formal or informal practices and procedure in place. They must be reasonably designed to promote and facilitate overall compliance with the Code.
Let me give you an example. The plan sponsor of a SEP may include in its plan operating manual specific steps to determining when new employees are eligible to enter the plan, so that the eligibility rules of the Code will always be satisfied. Please remember that a plan document alone does not constitute evidence of any established procedures.
SCP is available for correcting operational problems only. That is, the failure to follow the terms of the plan. SCP is not available for other types of problems, such as failing to keep the plan document up-to-date to reflect all changes. We will talk about this issue in more detail later in the presentation.
Under SCP, the plan sponsor corrects mistakes using the general correction principles described in Section 6 of the EPCRS Revenue Procedure. If a plan sponsor corrects a mistake listed in, and in accordance with, the correction methods included in Appendix A or Appendix B of the Revenue Procedure, it may be certain that the correction is reasonable and appropriate for the mistake. The plan sponsor may need to make changes to its administrative procedures to ensure the mistakes don’t happen again.
Now the Self-Correction Program may be used if, considering all the facts and circumstances, the mistakes in the aggregate are insignificant operational failures. You may be wondering to yourself, how do you decide if a mistake is significant or insignificant? Look at the facts and circumstances. The Revenue Procedure lists some to consider. This list is not all-inclusive, but some examples include: the percentage of plan assets involved in the failure, the number of years the failure occurred and whether the correction was made within a reasonable time after discovery of the failure.
If you determine the failure is insignificant, then document how you came to that decision. When using Self-Correction, the plan sponsor should maintain adequate records to demonstrate they have corrected the mistake in the event of an audit of the plan, and that is very important. If there is an audit of the plan, the agent will want to see the records that show how the mistake was corrected, and I would suggest also that you show them a written procedure on how you determined it was insignificant. That would be better off in case of an audit for a revenue agent to see to how what conclusions you came to and why you came to them.
Again, there is no fee for Self-Correction. I like to use a car analogy with this. Think of this program as similar to changing a tire on your car when you get a flat. You don’t call the dealership, you don’t bother anybody else, you fix the tire by yourself and then you move on.
The next program is called the Voluntary Correction Program, or VCP. This permits a plan sponsor to, any time before audit, pay a fee and receive the IRS’s approval for correction of plan mistakes. Using the car analogy, this is more like taking your car into the shop to get the brakes fixed.
Under Voluntary Correction, the plan sponsor identifies the mistakes, and proposes corrections using the general correction principles described in Section 6 of the EPCRS Revenue Procedure. The plan sponsor proposes changes to its administrative procedures to ensure the mistakes do not recur, and pay the compliance fee to the IRS of $250. The IRS issues a compliance statement, which details the qualification mistakes identified by the plan sponsor, and the correction approved by the IRS.
The plan sponsor corrects the identified mistakes within 150 days of the compliance statement, and while the submission is pending, Employee Plans will not examine the plan, except under unusual circumstances.
The third program is the Audit Closing Agreement Program, or Audit CAP. This permits a plan sponsor to pay a sanction, and correct the plan mistake while the plan is under audit. The plan sponsor will pay a sanction, which has been negotiated with the IRS and is based on the sum for all open taxable years of the:1. Additional income tax, including any interest and penalties that the employees would have to pay if contributions to the SEP-IRA were included in their income. This would also include any tax, including interest and penalties on distributions that the employees rolled over to other IRAs and additional tax from the 6% tax on excess contribution to IRAs. So, again, that’s the maximum payment amount, and then it would be negotiated from there between the agent, yourself and your client.
The sanction paid under Audit CAP will most likely always be greater than the fee paid under Voluntary Correction. Using the car analogy, envision your car breaking down on the freeway and being towed to the shop. And for those of you that do have the handout, we included a picture of a snake biting a man, and the reason why we do that -- more times than not on audit, when we show them how we found the mistake, a lot of times we hear, “Hey, if that was a snake, it would have bit me.” So it’s just important to take the time to go in and look over the plan yourself.
Let’s move on now to the potential errors. Again, we have five potential mistakes that we commonly find in SEPs. The first potential mistake is, “Has your SEP been amended for current law?” Laws related to retirement plans change quite frequently. Now, there are statutory deadlines which many provisions must become effective. The IRS generally establishes a firm deadline for adopting these changes. Also, these law changes might mean your client can simplify some areas of plan administration, or improve benefits. Your client will need to change plan language, and then operate it accordingly to keep the plan within the law.
How to find this mistake? At some point during the plan’s existence, your client may be asked to demonstrate if the plan is compliant with current and prior law. This request can come from many places. It could be a financial institution, a third-party administrator, another plan service provider, or from the IRS during an audit. Earlier we talked about some of the ways that the employer can adopt a SEP, first, using the model Form 5305-SEP, or a prototype plan; both of which have already been reviewed favorably by the IRS. If the plan is a model Form 5305-SEP and the revision date on it is December 2004, which can be found in the upper left-hand corner of the form, you can be assured that it complies with the law. If the plan is a prototype plan, you have a high-level of assurance, not as high as the model form, but a high-level of assurance that the plan has been updated for current law.
We also talked about individually designed SEPs. They must also be updated for law changes. If this is your client’s situation, you may want to consult a benefits professional.
How to fix this mistake? If you find your client has not amended its plan timely for the various law changes, your client should adopt amendments for the law changes it has missed. Your client can do this by adopting a prototype plan approved for EGTRRA, or a current IRS Form 5305-SEP, again, which has the revision date of December 2004. You will need to confirm that the plan’s operation is consistent with the terms of the updated plan.
Let me give you an example. We have an employer who established a SEP in 1995 using a prototype plan, and never subsequently amended for any law changes. Starting in 2002, the plan began using the increased contribution limits of EGTRRA. Due to the changes made by EGTRRA and other laws, the IRS issued revised model Form 5305-SEP documents in 2002. If an employer was using the pre-EGTRRA model SEP, and wanted to take advantage of the EGTRRA changes in 2002 plan year, then it should have adopted the revised Form 5305-SEP by the end of the 2002 plan year.
The rules for prototype adopters are a bit different. The employer should have adopted the EGTRRA-approved document within 180 days after the IRS issued a favorable EGTRRA Opinion Letter to the sponsoring organization of the prototype SEP. Now, the employer in this example would have to adopt an EGTRRA-revised document within 180 days after the IRS issued a favorable EGTRRA Opinion Letter to the sponsoring organization of the prototype SEP. If any of these conditions were not satisfied, then EPCRS would have to be used to correct the mistake by adopting the proper document.
So if your client has this mistake, which of the three correction programs are available? First, the Self-Correction. Your client may not correct this type of mistake under Self-Correction. As I stated earlier, the Self-Correction Program is limited to operational problems. And, this mistake is a result of not keeping the plan language up-to-date.
In order to retain plan qualification, your client must correct this mistake under VCP. So, your client can make a VCP submission to the IRS identifying the mistake. The fee for correcting this mistake would be $250.
If the IRS discovers this mistake on audit, your client may correct it under Audit CAP. The method of correcting this mistake would be the same as under VCP or Audit CAP, but the sanction under Audit CAP is a percentage of the maximum payment amount, and it would be greater than $250.
So we’ve talked about the find, the fix. Lastly, how can you help your client avoid this mistake? There are a few ways:
The next potential mistake: Are all eligible employees participating in the SEP? Your client must allow all eligible employees to participate -- and we’re talking about part-time employees, seasonal employees, employees who die or terminate employment during the year.
An eligible employee is an employee who is at least age 21 and has performed service for your client in at least three of the immediately preceding five years. The term “employee” includes a self-employed individual who has earned income and a working business owner. In addition, certain leased employees are employees.
The SEP document can provide for less restrictive eligibility requirements, but not more restrictive. For example, if your client would like to use age 18, that is not a problem. If they want to use age 23, that would be a problem. The highest they could go is age 21.
Service means any work performed for your client for any time, however short. You may have heard in 401(k) plans or profit-sharing plans that there’s a 1,000 hours-of-service requirement. This is not the case in SEP. SEPs may not impose any hours-of-service requirement.
There are also employees who the employer does not need to cover under a SEP. They are employees covered by a union agreement, whose retirement benefits were bargained for in good faith by your client and their union, non-resident alien employees who didn’t earn U.S. income from your client and employees who received less than $550 in compensation during the year. This $550 is subject to the cost-of-living adjustments.
When your client determines which employees should be in the SEP, remember that employees includes all employees of all related employers, including controlled groups of corporations that include your client’s business, trades or businesses under common control with your client’s business and affiliated service groups that include your client’s business.
This means, for example, that if your client and/or his or her family members own a controlling interest in another business, employees of that other business are considered employees for purposes of determining who is eligible to participate in the SEP.
Again, let me give you a couple of examples. We have an employer who maintains a calendar-year SEP where the employee must perform service in at least three of the immediately preceding five years, reach age 21 and earn the minimum amount of compensation during the current year. And we have Ann, who worked for this employer during her summer breaks from college in 2005, 2006 and 2007, but never more than a few days in any year. In July of 2008, Ann turned 21. In August 2008, Ann began working for the employer on a full-time basis, earning $12,000 in 2008. Ann would be an eligible employee in 2008, because she met the minimum age requirement of 21, worked for the employer three of the five preceding years and met the minimum compensation requirement for 2008.
Another example, an employer designed its SEP to provide for immediate participation, regardless of age, service or compensation. So when Bob turns 18-years-old and begins working part-time for the employer in 2008, Bob would be an eligible employee. Again, an example of having a document that has less restrictive eligibility requirements. Not a problem.
Okay, how would you find this mistake? We suggest you complete the following steps:
Moving along on how to fix this mistake. Generally, if your client did not provide an employee the opportunity to participate in its SEP plan, it must make a fully vested contribution to the plan for the employee that compensates for the missed contribution. This corrective contribution is an employer contribution that is intended to place the employee in the same position had he participated in the plan timely.
Let me give you an example. We have an employer who maintains a SEP plan that provides for discretionary employer contributions that is on a comp-to-total-comp basis. For 2007, this employer contributed a fixed dollar amount to the plan. However, this employer inadvertently excluded Joe, who met the eligibility requirements for participating in the plan. Joe had terminated during the plan year and did not receive an allocation of the contributions. The contribution resulted in an allocation for each of the eligible employees, other than Joe, equal to 10% of compensation. Now if Joe had shared in the original allocations, each employee would have received an allocation of 9% of compensation.
So when we turn to the EPCRS Revenue Procedure, they provide two different methods for correcting the exclusion of eligible employees. Only one of these methods, the contribution method, is proper for SEPs in most cases, since the assets of the plans are held in IRAs. And what the contribution method requires is that the employer make a corrective contribution based on the excluded employee’s compensation to the plan. The corrective contribution must be adjusted for earnings. No adjustments are made to the employees who shared in the prior allocations, even if their allocations would have been different had the excluded employee not been excluded.
So going back to the example, the employer would contribute an amount that equals 10% of Joe’s compensation for the 2007 year, adjusted for earnings, and will not adjust whatsoever the 10% allocations that were made to the other employees.
So which of the three correction programs are available for this mistake? Well, the example I just gave illustrates an insignificant operational problem in that the employer failed to follow the terms of the plan by not giving one employee an allocation of the contribution to the plan for the 2007 year. Therefore, if the other eligibility requirements of Self-Correction are satisfied, this employer can use SCP to correct the mistake.
A reminder -- there are no fees for Self-Correction and the employer must have practices and procedures in place. This correction is also eligible for Voluntary Correction and the correction would be the same. The employer would make the submission to the IRS and pay the fee of $250. And, as always, it’s eligible for Audit CAP. If the IRS would come out and find this during examination, the employer and IRS would enter into the closing agreement, outlining the corrective action, and again, negotiate a sanction based on the maximum payment amount.
Finally, how can you advise your clients to avoid this mistake? Your clients should review the participation status of all employees at least once a year. The person assigned this task should have a good understanding of the eligibility requirements of the plan and have access to the employment and payroll records necessary to make eligibility decisions for all employees.
Moving on to the third mistake. Is the business that the SEP covers the only business that your client owns? As I previously stated, employees, for purposes of determining who is an eligible employee under a SEP, includes all employees of all related employers to your client’s business. This would include control groups of corporations, trades or businesses under common control, and affiliated service groups. This means, for example, if your client or your client’s family members own a controlling interest in another business, employees of that other business are employees for purposes of determining who is eligible to participate in the SEP. You may think I’m being repetitive, but we see this issue a lot, and that’s why we’re being that way.
How to find this mistake? All owners or partners of your client’s business should identify any companies that they own or with which they have a financial relationship. If any of these companies or relationships exist, the requirements of the following Code sections should be scrutinized to ensure that all required employees are included in the plan. These Code sections are Code Sections 414(b), (c) and (m).
Going on to how to fix this mistake. Generally, if your client did not provide an employee the opportunity to participate in its SEP plan, your client must make a fully vested contribution to the plan for the employee that compensates for the missed contribution. The corrective contribution is an employer contribution that is intended to place the employee in the same position had he or she participated in the plan timely.
Again, let’s take a look at an example. We have an employer who owns a restaurant that has 40 employees. The employer also owns a computer store that has 30 employees. The employer established a SEP plan in 2007, and only the eligible employees from the restaurant were included in the plan. Applying the control group rules, the 30 employees of the computer store would be eligible employees because the employer owns both the restaurant and the computer store. Because the computer store employees were improperly excluded, they would have to receive allocations using the contribution method described in the earlier mistake regarding the eligible employees participating or an alternative correction method that satisfies general correction principles in the EPCRS Revenue Procedure.
Now which correction programs are available for this mistake? This example would be a significant operational problem, in that the employer improperly excluded all of the computer store employees, almost 50% of his employees. Because this example was a significant operational failure, Self-Correction is not available for this mistake and the employer must go to Voluntary Correction or to Audit CAP.
Again, the same things apply under VCP. Correction would be the corrective contribution to all excluded employees, file a submission to the IRS and pay the fee of $250. Under Audit CAP correction would be the same. The employer and the IRS would enter into the closing agreement, and negotiate a sanction based on the maximum payment amount.
And how would you advise your client on how to avoid making this mistake? I would suggest that your client follow the steps described earlier in the earlier mistake, mistake #2, and should include determining if all owners or partners in your client’s business owned any other business. Again, just a yearly check just to make sure everything is still running smooth.
Moving onto the next mistake. Is your client determining each eligible employee’s compensation using the definition in its SEP document? A plan’s definition of compensation is very important in determining the amount of contributions because they are often based on a percentage of compensation. Compensation generally includes the pay an employee receives from your client for personal services for a year including wages and salaries, fees for professional services and other amounts received, whether it be cash or non-cash, for personal services actually rendered by an employee. The amount of compensation taken into account under the plan cannot exceed $245,000 in 2010, and is subject to the cost-of-living adjustments for later years.
Your client must follow the definition of compensation stated in the plan document in the operation of the plan. And that’s very important. If you’ve seen some prototype adoption agreements, sometimes there’s 10 or more items listed in what can be or cannot be included in compensation and it’s very important that your client follows and knows what’s stated in the plan so that he or she can do the same thing operationally.
How to find this mistake? To determine if your client is using the proper compensation for allocations, you’ll need to refer to the plan document. Spot check allocations to see if your client is using the correct compensation. Some of these definitions get very complicated, as I mentioned, with expense reimbursements, car allowances, bonuses, commissions, overtime pay that is included or not included in the definition of compensation.
If the plan has a complicated definition of compensation, our suggestion is develop a worksheet to calculate the correct amounts. If your client is using the Form 5305-SEP, make sure he’s basing allocations on total compensation.
Going on to fixing this mistake, your client would have to make a corrective contribution, including earnings, for the affected employees. Again, another example. We have an employer who operates a restaurant with 15 employees. Under the terms of a SEP document, compensation for determining allocations of the employer contribution is defined as total wages earned, including bonuses, tips and other income reported on the form W-2. Since the inception of the plan, the employer included bonuses and other income for the contribution allocation, but did not include tips. So, the employer should correct the allocations using the same contribution method discussed earlier in the eligible employees participating mistake.
Which correction programs are available for this mistake? This example illustrates an operational problem, in that the employer failed to follow the plan’s definition of compensation by not including tips, and used an incorrect amount to determine allocations under the plan. Therefore, if the other eligibility requirements of SCP are satisfied, the employer can use Self-Correction to correct this mistake. Again, remember there are no fees and the employer must have practices and procedures in place.
The VCP correction is the same and all of the procedures are the same and the same $250. Under Audit CAP, the correction is the same and remember they would just enter into a closing agreement and negotiate a sanction based on the maximum payment amount.
Finally, how to avoid this mistake? Three easy words: Read the plan. But when calculating these allocations, it’s important for your client to review the terms yearly to ensure it’s using the correct amounts of compensation. And we have seen some software out there that can put it in the payroll program and creates an account that accumulates the proper compensation figures for plan purposes.
The last potential mistake is: Are SEP contributions to each employee’s IRA limited as required by the Internal Revenue Code? All SEP contributions are employer contributions. Section 415 of the Code limits the amount of contributions made to an employee’s SEP-IRA to the lesser of $49,000 in 2010, and again, remember that’s subject to the cost-of-living adjustments for later years, or 25% of the eligible employee’s compensation. The amount of compensation taken into account is limited to $245,000 for 2010, and, again, subject to cost-of-living adjustments in later years.
Now if the SEP plan document specifies lower contribution limits then the lower limits control. Let me repeat that, because it’s very important. If the SEP plan document specifies lower contribution limits, the lower limits control.
There are special rules if an individual is self-employed. When calculating the deduction for contributions made to a self-employed individual’s SEP-IRA, compensation is the individual’s net earnings from self-employment, which is reduced by both the deduction for half of his or her self-employment tax and the deduction for contributions to his or her own SEP-IRA. For this reason, you determine the deduction for contributions to a self-employed individual’s SEP-IRA indirectly by reducing the contribution rate called for in the plan.
For more information on the deduction limitations for self-employed individuals, see our Publication 560, which is called, “Retirement Plans for Small Businesses, (SEP, SIMPLE, and Qualified Plans).”
How to find this mistake? The easy way, calculate 25% of each employee’s compensation, and compare the total contribution made for the employee to the lesser of that amount or the dollar limitation for that year; again, $49,000 this year. The not-so-easy way, unfortunately, is to review the special calculations in the Publication 560 for the self-employed individuals.
How to fix this mistake? There are two methods to correct excess employer contributions to employees. The first one is called the Distribution of Excess Amounts Method. The plan sponsor may affect the distribution of the excess amount, adjusted for earnings through the date of correction. The earnings adjustment is based on the actual rate of return of the SEP-IRA from the date the excess employer contribution was made through the date of correction. The amount returned to your client is not includable in the gross income of the affected employee. The plans sponsor would not be entitled to a deduction for the excess contribution. Report the amount returned on Form 1099-R as a distribution issued to the affected employee, indicating the taxable amount as zero.
The second method is called the retention method and the amount in excess of the 415 limit may be retained in the SEP-IRA. This correction method is available under VCP and requires an additional fee. The fee is equal to at least 10% of the excess amount, excluding earnings. The excess amount, adjusted for earnings through the date of correction must reduce the affected employee’s 415 limit for the year of correction and subsequent years until the excess is eliminated.
Again, an example. An employer maintains a SEP plan. For the 2007 year, the contributions made for two employees, Tom and Will, exceeded the 415 limit. Tom had an excess of $3,000, and Will had an excess of $300. On January 1, 2008, Will terminated his employment. Which correction programs are available for this? Thinking back to the example, this illustrates an operational problem in that this employer failed to follow the terms of the plan by exceeding the 415 limits in the plan document and in the Code.
Therefore, if the other eligibility requirements of SCP are satisfied, the employer can use SCP to correct the failure by using the distribution of excess amounts correction method only. There would be no fee for the self-correction, and again, you have to have the practices and procedures in place.
Under VCP, correction under the distribution of excess amounts method is the same. The employer would make a VCP submission to the IRS and pay the VCP submission fee of $250.
Now, if your client chooses to make correction under the retention method by retaining the excess amounts in the SEP-IRA, the EPCRS Rev Proc imposes an additional fee equal to at least 10% of the excess amount, excluding earnings, in addition to the $250 submission fee. If it would happen to go under Audit CAP, correction could be the same. There would be the closing agreement negotiation based on the maximum payment amount.
How to avoid this mistake? After the employer makes the initial calculation of allocations based on the terms of the plan, your client should check to make sure none of the proposed allocations would violate Code Section 415. Make the calculation based on the plan language, check this against the 415 rules before the actual allocation is made to the SEP. If there is a problem, your client can adjust it before the transfer of the money into the SEP accounts.
I have been talking a lot about the COLA increases. If you go to our main page, again, www.irs.gov/ep, we do have the COLA limits on there for every year.
On the next slide of the handout, I provided other SEP products that we have besides the Fix-It Guide. The first one is Publication 4333. It is called “SEP Retirement Plans for Small Businesses.” This is a joint publication with the IRS and the Department of Labor. It has been revised. October 2009 is the latest revision date. In here it gives you and your client some things to read about. For instance, advantages of a SEP, how to establish, how to operate the SEP, and if need be, how to terminate the SEP. It also gives some quick checklists, talks a little bit about mistakes. Also gives other resources that the IRS and the Department of Labor have on SEP plans. And it also includes the model 5305-SEP Form that we discussed with that December 2004 revision date. Everything you want to know about a SEP but were afraid to ask.
The item on the right is a SEP checklist. It is important to review the requirements for operating a SEP every year. And this checklist has been designed as a diagnostic tool to help you and your clients keep the SEP in compliance with important tax rules.
Now this is kind of like the top 10 list. What I discussed today were the top five errors, so there are some on here. For instance, have you made required top-heavy minimum contributions to a SEP, and other ones, and they have yes or no answers. This can be completed online, and if it is, some key terms are underlined, and they provide links to a more detailed explanation of that item.
If there is a “no” answer to any of the questions, there may be a mistake in the operation of the SEP and we actually go to the Correcting Plan Errors Web page and I’ll discuss that in a minute.
This discussion today was based on one of our Fix-It Guides. We have three other guides that provide the same tips, provide the common problems and real solutions to errors in 401(k) plans, SARSEPs, and SIMPLE [IRA]s. Each guide provides an overview of the rules for each plan type, an overview of the EPCRS programs, the most frequent errors we find and tips on how to find, fix and avoid these mistakes. The format of each guide enables users to navigate, select and print only mistakes that are of interest to them. Again, these are located on our main page, as I mentioned earlier.
Now when you and your client find a mistake, a decision has to be made on what to do next. If you notice if you have the handout, the gentleman there is thinking Self-Correct, VCP or do nothing. Hopefully, it’s never do nothing. I’ve provided an overview of the three components of EPCRS earlier. I also gave you several examples on when and how to use each one. For more information on EPCRS, please visit our Correcting Plan Errors Web page. You’ll also find this link on our main page, but the link is located on the top left portion of the main page under the heading Retirement Plans Community Topics. On this page you will find that is new in EPCRS, a detailed explanation of the three components, tips on finding, fixing and avoiding plan errors and other resources available to you. And there is no truth to the rumor that we automatically audit only plans where the plan sponsor practitioner bookmarks this page.
On the next slide, we have developed many tools to assist you and your clients with retirement plans, trying to answer, hopefully, all of your questions. On there again, you’ll see the link or the address to our main page, or you can go to the Retirement Plans Community Web page on the main www.irs.gov landing page. On our page you’ll find information for benefits practitioners, plan participant/employee and plan sponsor/employer. These pages contain all the retirement plan information that you’ve come to expect from EP. You will find pages dedicated to the Fix-It Guides and Correcting Plan Errors, as I mentioned, as well as many other resources to help you keep your clients out of trouble with the IRS.
Now there are two different ways you can discuss your questions with a retirement plan specialist. If we cannot get to your questions today, for example, you can call our Customer Accounts Services toll-free at (877) 829-5500. The call center’s hours are from 8:30 to 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time. Or if you prefer, you can e-mail your questions and the e-mail address is email@example.com. Our specialists must respond to all e-mail questions by telephone, so please remember to include your phone number and a customer service representative will call you with the answer to your questions.
Finally, we have two free, quarterly electronic newsletters you can subscribe to. The first one is Employee Plans News. This newsletter is geared toward the practitioner community and is more technical and involved than our newsletter geared to our plan sponsors, Retirement News for Employers. Being a Web-based product, the newsletters make an excellent reference guide as we fill them with embedded links and source materials. And it gives you the latest and greatest that we’re finding in [the] world of exam, rulings and agreements and voluntary compliance.
Subscribing to these newsletters will keep you and your clients current with the latest news. Just go to “Newsletters” in the left- hand of our Web page, again, under the heading of “Retirement Plans Community Topics.” Click on “Employee Plans News” or “Retirement News For Employers.” You can subscribe to both if you wish. Click on “Subscribe” and then provide the e-mail address and that’s all it takes. You will receive a message in your inbox with a link directing you to the newsletter when we post our latest issue. Again, it’s only a link. We won’t fill your inbox with a large PDF document. We’ll take you to the link, we’ll take you to that, because we know how some of the inboxes can get.
We’ll now turn the presentation over to Avaneesh, who has some questions that have been submitted. Avaneesh, take it away.
A. Bhagat: Thank you very much, Mikio. That was a very informative presentation. We will now start with the questions. Please be advised that the program is still being recorded. A transcript and/or an audio recording of this program may be made publicly available on www.irs.gov. So with this administrative piece over, what I’m going to do is, I’m going to start with the e-mail questions and then we’ll just take it from there.
The first is, “Can a customized SEP exclude non-union employees, but include union employees?” There are two points I need to make on this one. First, I strongly recommend regardless of what your desire is, please do not customize SEP documents. The reason for this is any time you change the terms—if you’re using the IRS form 5305, or you change the terms of that form, or an IRS pre-approved plan document, you no longer have reliance on that document. So basically you’ve taken that cushion away of having IRS reliance on the plan document that you’re using to govern your plan. So that right away could jeopardize the tax-favored status of your plan as a whole, so recognize that risk.
This particular question can be an illustration of why customizing plan documents creates these problems. If you change the plan document to say I’m going to just include union employees and exclude non-union employees, what you are doing is basically, you’re excluding a class of employees for which whom you are not allowed to exclude in the first place under the qualification requirement for SEP. Remember when Mikio made his presentation earlier, he said that there were certain excludable classes of employees, people who ….meet the age requirement or didn’t work for a certain number of years, like three of the last five years, people whose benefits were collectively bargained for. That is your union employees, or your non-resident aliens with no U.S. income. These are your only excludable classes of employees. So once you come to exclude any other group, members of any other group aside from your excludable classes of employees, your SEP is no good. So that’s one of the perils of customizing a SEP document.
Related question, “Can SEP model agreement be amended in a subsequent year to increase the years of service performed for eligibility purposes? For example, in the initial plan year, one-year prior service is required and this would be increased to two prior years of service in a subsequent year.” As long as you’re sticking within the parameters of your SEP document, meaning it might provide certain blanks, such as you could have an age requirement and then you can say perform service for blank number of years not to exceed three and you select that option. What you’re doing is, you’re changing that option but you’re sticking with the parameters of that plan document. Yes, you should amend your plan document if you’re changing the requirements and that amended plan document needs to be signed.
So in a particular scenario where you had a service requirement which said that the individual should have worked in one of the previous five years, you have to stick with that requirement. And then if you want to change it going forward to do something more stringent, such as having worked two of the prior five years, then you can change the terms. You adopt a new adoption agreement or a new 5305 first and then go ahead and implement those terms. You should always administer the plan in accordance with the terms of your plan document with that is, Form-5305 or an adoption agreement tied with a pre-approved plan.
Next question, “A self-employed person with no employees established a SEP over 20 years using IRS Form-5305. The same person established a 401(k) plan when some solo K plans started becoming popular a few years ago. The person did not realize that having both a SEP and a qualified plan is not allowed when you’re using the Form-5305. Contributions are made to both plans, 415 limits were not exceeded. How can this be corrected through a Voluntary Compliance Program submission?” Here’s a case where we may be able to help. What we might do, for example is, we might consider the possibility of allowing the plan sponsor to correct the problem by retroactively adopting a financial institution’s pre-approved document because that pre-approved document may have parameters, which would allow two plans to co-exist with each other. So you’re not a violating a set rule per se, you’re just constrained by a plan document that didn’t allow you to have another plan.
So in that particular situation, we might consider the possibility of adopting a new document that could accommodate that variation. And that way the employee might be able to preserve his pre-tax benefits in both plans. So that’s a possibility. Now if you do that, again, as we point out, it has to be in the context of a Voluntary Compliance Program submission. You could do that on your own without IRS approval.
Next question, “If you have a partnership with a SEP and also have a Schedule C, do you have two SEP investment accounts if you’re relying on income from both to maximize the SEP or can you contribute to the partnership SEP account for that individual?” The general answer is if you have two separate employers, then each employer would be sponsoring its own SEP. However, be cognizant of the following. If both your entities, your partnership and your employer and your sole proprietorship are members of the same control group or some of your service groups if you remember in Mikio’s presentations earlier about the business entities and referring to Sections 414(b), (c), (m), those are the factors you would need to consider and take into account for determining whether you have a controlled group or an affiliated service group.
And then you have the case where both of these are really a single employer and it would be a single SEP. Once you do that then, all employees of both entities need to be considered for purposes of who’s includable in that SEP. So be aware of that, but otherwise if you have two separate entities, each entity would have its own SEP.
Another scenario, “Sole practitioner has a child working for him during the summer. The child has worked three of the last five years and over the $550. Child …..is working in August 2009 to return to school. Child turns 21 in November 2009 after he’s been working for the employer. Does the child need to have a SEP contribution for 2009?” And really what you do is you look at the situation as of the end of the year when the allocations are being made. So as of the end of 2009, what are the two requirements for participation then? He clearly met the work requirement. He worked for three of the last five years. He made $550 during the year and also during the year, the child obtained age 21. So all of the conditions for participation were met. Therefore, the child would be entitled to an allocation of the contribution.
I know these get confusing because you have situations where you have intermittent people who could work for part of the year and are not employed as of the last day of the plan year. But you can’t have the last day of the plan year conditions for a person receiving an allocation. So basically, you’re just taking the snapshot as of the time the allocation is made and if you look and you see both conditions are satisfied, then that person would be entitled to an allocation.
Next one, “An employer has been contributing to a SEP for several years. Early in 2010 this employer realized that an employee became eligible in the prior year. How would the catch-up contributions, if you will, be made to this employee’s IRA? What is the tax treatment in the year of the payment to both the employer and the employee?” So here you have a situation where you have an employee who in 2009 was eligible for an allocation of the SEP contribution, but didn’t receive that allocation. So in that particular scenario, what you have is a failure to make required contributions on behalf of an eligible employee.
One possible option is you could use the Voluntary Correction Program and propose a solution of making up the required contribution on behalf of the erroneously excluded employee, plus earnings. And if we approve your correction, we issue a compliance statement. And then you could show that compliance statement to the financial institution and the financial institution would probably accept contributions on behalf of the employee for both the prior year, as well as whatever is due in the current year. And then tax consequences would be probably be something along the following lines.
The employer could claim deductions for the year in which the corrective contribution is made, but it’s subject to the deductible limits for the current year. So you have to take into account the current year deductible limits when you’re figuring out how much the employer could deduct. So now you can have a situation where the required contributions actually cause the plan to exceed the deductible limit for the plan year. The result would be that your nondeductible contributions, because you have to make those contributions in order to keep your SEP qualified, but those excess contributions are subject to excise taxes under Section 4972 of the Code. What you might want to do in that situation is, you may as part of your application under VCP want to ask for relief from the imposition of that 4972 excise tax because what the EPCRS revenue procedure allows you to do is in situations where a corrective contribution is required on behalf of employees as a part of a successful VCP submission, those situations where you exceed the deductible limit as a result of that, the service would entertain the prospect of approving relief from the imposition of the 4972 excise tax, because we want you to make that corrective contribution. Of course, you are still consigned to the deductible limits, as far as how much you actually deduct. But at least you get relief from the excise tax piece.
Next one, the question is, this is a two-part question, so actually what I’ll do is, I’ll do the second part first. Okay, here’s the total question. “I would like to know if A) must leased employees be counted as an employee for purposes of the SEP plan or are they counted from who gives them their paycheck?” Let’s deal with this first part first. Generally, a leased employee is counted for purposes of determining if he’s an employee of the employer and therefore should participate in the employer SEP.
Having said that, though, there’s actually a precise definition for who a leased employee is. And so what I would encourage you do to is look at, if you’re looking at Code sections, look at section 414(n). If you are comfortable with Pubs, look at the definition of leased employee and publication 550. It has a real precise definition of who a leased employee is. So if you look at that definition, that class of leased employees are includable in that employer’s SEP plan. I won’t get into the angles of the definition of a leased employee because that would be too complicated to talk about in this setting. So just look at that definition and see if your leased employees fit within that classification. And again, you could look at publication 560. I think it’s on the third page of publication 560. Or if you are comfortable with going to the Code, look at section 414(n) of the Code.
Then the second part of the question is, “Would intermittent employment count for purposes of the SEP plan and if so, is there an amount any particular employee must make before they are eligible, like SIMPLE IRA plans are?” So there are many pieces to this question. First of all, in a SEP plan, you don’t have elective …deferrals, so you don’t have employee contributions like you would in the case of a SIMPLE IRA plan. And as far as intermittent employment goes, generally the answer would be yes because all it takes, assuming the employee has met the age requirement, which would be 21 and worked [up to] three of the prior plan years, all it takes is a $550 compensation level in order for the employee to eligible. So you can have an employee who worked for a relatively short period of time become eligible to participate in your SEP plan. It doesn’t take too much time to earn [$550 in] compensation. So the general answer to that would be yes, intermittent employees would also be considered in your SEP plan. Both leased employees, as well as intermittent employees would be considered for your SEP plan.
The next one, “Regarding farmers who have a March 1st filing deadline, if they file by March 1st, can they still pay into a SEP by October 15th or do they have to be on extension to have the extended contribution period? You have to contribute before filing.” …. Extensions should have been filed in order for an employer to have an extended contribution period. So if an employer actually files his return by the original deadline and does not file for an extension, then you don’t have the benefit of the extended period for purposes of making the SEP contribution. Then you’re stuck with the original due date. So in order for the employer to get the advantage of the extended due date, the employer actually has to file an extension as opposed to just filing the return in order to make the required contribution.
But you could have a scenario, for example, where, say on March 1, you file the extension. And so now that extends you to that extended due date. But then you actually file your return before then. As long as you file the extension, you can then take advantage of the extended due date for purposes of making the actual required contribution to your SEP. So really it’s tied to whether you file the extensions or not and then that will determine whether you can take advantage of the extended due date.
This one says, “Could you please explain the multiple plan contribution algorithm? Most examples only deal with the SEP being the single plan that the participant is a part of. The multiple plan explains how one can contribute up to 100% of their earnings if they have contributed to and a defined contribution plan, but haven’t exceeded the maximum allowable contribution of $49,000.” Okay, what this is talking about, this is based on section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code. This is a total limit for the employee. So you could have a situation where the employer has multiple plans. What this represents is a total limit of what the employee could receive under all defined contribution plans, including SEPs in a given year. The limit is not just restricted to employer contributions, but a term called annual additions. So the annual additions include both employer contributions, as well as employee contributions and the third category called forfeitures. So the sum of employer contributions and employee contributions and forfeiture allocations made on behalf of the employee to all defined contributions including a SEP in a given year cannot exceed the lesser of 100% of earnings or the $49,000 limit. So it’s an overall limit.
And so the practical impact of this is as follows. If you just have a SEP standing alone, the employer is probably constrained with respect to a particular employee by the 100% of compensation or $49,000 limit, because there are no other plans to coordinate with. Now if the employer also sponsored some other defined contribution plans in which that employee is a participant, in that situation what you have is a scenario where you would need to take into account contributions made to those other plans.
So, for example, if an employer also has a profit-sharing plan, and they make $10,000 of contributions to that profit-sharing plan, and assuming there’s no other contributions, then in your SEP, that limit is going to be reduced. And let’s assume for the sake of simplicity that we’re talking about a $49,000 limit here and assuming that’s less than 100% of the compensation. And $10,000 is [contributed] to the profit-sharing plan, then your contribution limit to the SEP is reduced from $49,000 to $39,000. So just recognize that this is an overall limit that applies to the employee for contributions to all defined contribution plans. And when we were talking about that, we’re not just talking about employer contributions, but also employee contributions and forfeiture allocations. So that’s what the multiple plan contribution requirement is.